The modern battlefield is as dynamic as it is deadly. Small, unmanned aerial systems are taking out larger weapons for pennies on the dollar, forcing NATO nations to adapt and deal with attack vehicles that are often the same kind of devices one can buy at a store, just with some extra kit.
â Defense of Ukraine (@DefenceU) May 16, 2024Javelins and FPV drones leave no chances for the occupiers.
Even the "turtle tank" can't resist such a fiery combo.đš: 93rd Mechanized Brigade pic.twitter.com/dm1FAKmpu8
âItâs a component of a larger group of capabilities that will make a difference on the battlefield,â Gordon âSkipâ Davis said. âWeâve seen that in spades in Ukraine specifically, but also in the Red Sea with the exploitation by the Houthis, or even in the fighting in Israel.â
Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Factsâ˘.
Point phone camera here
Davis, a retired Army general and former NATO staffer, is now a non-resident senior fellow with the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA). He recently took part in a virtual press conference held by CEPA focusing on the many lessons learned concerning drone warfare in Ukraine. One of the first and most immediate takeaways: A cost-effective means of defense is going to be paramount for any NATO ally that finds itself in a drawn-out conflict.
Ukraine mixes ancient weapon with drone tech to take out Russian forces
âWe just cannot continue to shoot things down with expensive defensive systems that are so much more expensive than the small drones,â said Lance Landrum, another non-resident senior fellow with CEPA and retired Air Force officer. âAnd so we have to figure out a way to flip that cost curve.â
In the Red Sea right now, the most commonly used missile to counter the drone and cruise missile threats is the Navyâs Standard Missile 2, or SM-2. The missiles cost about $2 million each, and spoiler: a Navy destroyer doesnât have an endless supply of SM-2s.
âA destroyer only holds 96 missiles in its vertical launch system,â said Tate Westbrook, a former captain of a destroyer and commodore of a fleet of destroyers before retiring from the Navy. âSo, if you got into a heavy engagement with either multiple air threats, multiple missiles, or as weâve seen lately in the Red Sea multiple drones, I was always worried: was my ship, or my squadron of ships, were they going to run out of missiles too soon in the fight? [Would they] have to leave station and reload?â
Attacks from Iran against Israel prove need for laser weapons
After retiring from the Navy, Westbrook went to work for BAE Systems where he is now the director of business development for naval guns and missile launchers. His job is to help make some new weapons that the U.S. military wants yesterday.
One of these new weapons is the Hypervelocity Projectile (HVP), a new round of ammunition that can be fired from any Mk 45 deck gun in the Navyâs fleet. As the name suggests, the HVP travels extremely fast, but it has a few more tricks hidden up its sabot-sleeves.
âWhat Hypervelocity Projectile brings, besides slightly increased range, is a significant improvement in lethality,â Westbrook said during an interview with him and one of his colleagues, David Smialek, BAEâs director of business development for precision guidance and sensing solutions.
AI agents go nose-to-nose with human pilots in real-world dogfight
â[The HVP] round itself will maneuver to target as the ship is transmitting the target information to the round,â Westbrook said. âThe small computer inside the round itself is commanding the round to the optimal intercept. Our objective is essentially one shot, one kill with an exact or very close intercept, because of the maneuver of the round. Weâre significantly increasing how many targets [combat commanders] can engage over time with just one or two rounds compared to conventional munitions that may take multiple rounds to score an effective kill against a maneuvering air target.â
The Navy isnât the only U.S. service branch BAE Systems is working with to develop HVPs. In fact, the HVP can even be fired out of a Paladin mobile howitzer, which uses the NATO standard 155 mm artillery round. Thatâs great news for the U.S. Army, since it was relying on the Air Force for most of its air defense capability. Thatâs a prospect which is quickly being abandoned now that drones are so ubiquitous on the battlefield.
Go behind the scenes in the life of a Navy officer: Weapons and Warfare
Davis said that BAE doesnât have the HVP in full production just yet and he couldnât give an exact price per round. However, he and Smialek both said the final cost will be a fraction of what an SM-2 costs.
When it comes to air defense as a whole, however, there is no single solution. A layered approach is always better. As the top provider of the Navyâs layered air defense systems, BAE obviously agrees. To that end, the company developed another option to counter unmanned aerial systems. The new solution combines two already proven weapons into a very lethal, very accurate defender.
Component one is the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System, or APKWS. Itâs a laser-guided rocket thatâs been in production for over a decade now. It has a reported range between one and four miles. Itâs small enough to be loaded by hand, versatile enough to fit on a variety of vehicles, and at around $20,000 a rocket, it has proved to be a relatively inexpensive but effective way to deal with smaller classes of drones.
Armed drone-on-drone violence documented in Ukraine
Smialek summed it up nicely when he said, âSo, for an interceptor, you know, it makes a lot of sense, right? I mean, you canât dispute what it can do.â
Smialek also said the APKWS is widely available and already in use in the DODâs current inventory. BAE also has the infrastructure to make about 25,000 a year right now.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
So, if the APKWS is the first part of the solution, whatâs the second? The Mk 38 stabilized gun. Now, like the APKWS, the Mk 38 has been around for a while. Whatâs new is the gunâs ability to now fire the APKWS as well.
A robotic future: US Army considering a platoon of steel to save lives
Davis and Smialek said BAE installed and tested the new variant Mk 38 on a U.S. naval vessel, but canât release any images of it right now for fear of identifying the ship. Obviously a legitimate security concern. However, they did say there are nearly 500 Mk 38s installed on U.S. naval vessels, and with minimal modifications, those guns can be ready to fire the APKWS as well.
And there is another major benefit of both HVP and deck-mounted APKWS launchers. Unlike the larger, more exquisite weapons like the SM-2, which canât be reloaded at sea, both the HVP and APKWS can be replenished while a vessel is underway. This ability gives every captain more options in a conflict, and more âstowed killsâ with every mission.
Tags: Drones, Israel, missiles, NATO, Navy, Red Sea, War, Weapons
THE MODERN BATTLEFIELD IS AS DYNAMIC AS IT IS DEADLY. SMALL, UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS ARE TAKING OUT LARGER WEAPONS FOR PENNIES ON THE DOLLAR. OFTEN TIMES, THE ATTACK VEHICLES ARE THE SAME SORT OF DEVICES YOU CAN BUY AT A STORE, BUT WITH SOME EXTRA KIT.
Gordon âSkipâ Davis: Itâs a component of a larger group of capabilities that will make a difference on the battlefield. And weâve seen that in spades in Ukraine specifically, but also, you know, what weâve seen in the Red Sea, exploitation by Houthis, or even, you know, in the fighting in Israel.
THAT WAS GORDON âSKIPâ DAVIS, A RETIRED ARMY GENERAL AND FORMER NATO STAFFER. DURING A VIRTUAL PRESS CONFERENCE HELD BY THE CENTER FOR EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS, DAVIS AND OTHER CEPA FELLOWS EXPLAINED OF THE MANY LESSONS LEARNED CONCERNING DRONE WARFARE IN UKRAINE, FINDING A COST-EFFECTIVE MEANS OF DEFENSE IS GOING TO BE PARAMOUNT FOR ANY NATO ALLY THAT FINDS THEMSELVES IN A DRAWN-OUT CONFLICT.
Lance Landrum: We just cannot continue to shoot things down with expensive defensive systems that are so much more expensive than the small drones. And so we have to figure out a way to flip that cost curve.
IN THE RED SEA RIGHT NOW, THE MOST COMMONLY USED MISSILE TO COUNTER THE DRONE AND CRUISE MISSILE THREATS ARE THE NAVYâS STANDARD MISSILE 2, OR SM-2s. THEY COST ABOUT $2 MILLION A POP, AND SPOILER: A NAVY DESTROYER DOESNâT HAVE AN ENDLESS SUPPLY OF SM-2s.
Tate Westbrook: A destroyer only holds 96 missiles in its vertical launch system. And so if you got into a heavy engagement with either multiple air threats, multiple missiles, or as weâve seen lately in the Red Sea multiple dronesâI was always worried was my ship, or my squadron of ships, were they going to run out of missiles too soon in the fight? And have to leave station and reload?
TATE WESTBROOK USED TO CAPTAIN A US NAVY DESTROYER, AND WAS ALSO THE COMMODORE OF A FLEET OF DESTROYERS. NOW, HE WORKS FOR BAE SYSTEMS HELPING TO DESIGN SOME NEW WEAPONS THAT THE U.S. MILITARY WANTS YESTERDAY.
ONE OF THESE NEW WEAPONS IS THE HYPERVELOCITY PROJECTILE, A NEW ROUND OF AMMUNITION THAT CAN BE FIRED FROM ANY MARK 45 DECK GUN IN THE NAVYâS FLEET. AS THE NAME SUGGESTS, THE HVP TRAVELS EXTREMELY FAST, BUT IT HAS A FEW MORE TRICKS HIDDEN UP IS SABOT-SLEEVES.
Westbrook: What Hypervelocity Projectile brings, besides slightly increased range, is a significant improvement in lethality because the round itself will maneuver to target as the ship is transmitting the target information to the round. The small computer inside the round itself is commanding the round to the optimal intercept. So, our objective is essentially one shot, one kill with an exact or very close intercept. Because of the maneuver of the round, [weâre] significantly increasing how many targets that they can engage over time with just one or or say two rounds compared to conventional munitions that may take multiple rounds to score an effective kill against a maneuvering air target.
THE NAVY ISNâT THE ONLY U.S. SERVICE BRANCH BAE SYSTEMS IS WORKING WITH TO DEVELOP HVPs. IN FACT, THE HVP CAN EVEN BE FIRED OUT OF A PALADIN MOBILE HOWITZER, WHICH USES THE NATO STANDARD 155mm ARTILLERY ROUND. THATâS GREAT NEWS FOR THE U.S. ARMY, SINCE IT WAS RELYING ON THE AIR FORCE FOR MOST OF ITS AIR DEFENSE CAPABILITY. A PROSPECT WHICH IS QUICKLY BEING ABANDONED NOW THAT DRONES ARE SO UBIQUITOUS ON THE BATTLEFIELD.
BAE SYSTEMS SAYS THE HVP ISNâT IN FULL PRODUCTION JUST YET, SO THEY COULDNâT GIVE ME AN EXACT PRICE PER ROUND BUT THEY ASSURED ME THE FINAL COST WILL BE A FRACTION OF WHAT AN SM-2 COSTS.
WHEN IT COMES TO AIR DEFENSE AS A WHOLE, HOWEVER, THERE IS NO SINGLE SOLUTION AND A LAYERED APPROACH IS ALWAYS BETTER.
AS THE TOP PROVIDER OF THE U.S. NAVYâS LAYERED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEMS, BAE OBVIOUSLY AGREES. AND TO THAT END, THE COMPANY DEVELOPED ANOTHER OPTION TO COUNTER UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS. THE NEW SOLUTION COMBINES TWO ALREADY PROVEN WEAPONS INTO A VERY LETHAL, VERY ACCURATE DEFENDER.
COMPONENT ONE IS THE ADVANCED PRECISION KILL WEAPON SYSTEM, OR APKWS. ITâS A LASER-GUIDED ROCKET THATâS BEEN IN PRODUCTION FOR OVER A DECADE NOW. IT HAS A REPORTED RANGE BETWEEN 1 AND 4 MILES. ITâS SMALL ENOUGH TO BE LOADED BY HAND, VERSATILE ENOUGH TO FIT ON A VARIETY OF VEHICLES, AND AT AROUND $20 GRAND A ROCKET, ITâs PROVED A RELATIVELY INEXPENSIVE BUT EFFECTIVE WAY TO DEAL WITH THE SMALLER CLASSES OF DRONES.
Dave Smialek: So, for an interceptor, you know, it makes a lot of sense, right? I mean, you canât dispute what it can do.
THATâS DAVE SMIALEK, THE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AT BAE FOR PRECISION GUIDANCE AND SENSING SOLUTIONS.
HE SAYS THE APKWS IS ALSO WIDELY AVAILABLE, AND BAE HAS THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO MAKE ABOUT 25,000 A YEAR RIGHT NOW.
SO, IF THE APKWS IS THE FIRST PART OF THE SOLUTION, WHATâS THE SECOND? THE Mk 38 STABILIZED GUN. NOW, LIKE THE APKWS, THE Mk 38 HAS BEEN AROUND FOR AWHILE. WHATâS NEW IS THE GUNâS ABILITY TO NOW FIRE THE APKWS AS WELL.
BAE SAYS ITâS INSTALLED AND TESTED THE NEW VARIANT Mk 38 ON A U.S. SHIP, BUT CANâT RELEASE ANY IMAGES OF IT RIGHT NOW FOR FEAR OF IDENTIFYING THE SHIP. OBVIOUS SECURITY REASONS.
BUT, BAE DID SAY THERE ARE NEARLY 500 Mk 38s INSTALLED ON U.S. NAVAL VESSELS, AND WITH MINIMAL MODIFICATIONS THOSE GUNS CAN BE READY TO FIRE THE APKWS AS WELL.
AND UNLIKE THE LARGER, MORE EXQUISITE WEAPONS LIKE THE SM-2, WHICH CANâT BE RELOADED AT SEA, BOTH THE HVP AND APKWS CAN BE REPLENISHED WHILE A VESSEL IS UNDERWAY, GIVING EVERY CAPTAIN MORE OPTIONS AND MORE STOWED KILLS WITH EVERY MISSION.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, IâM RYAN ROBERTSON.